Why is the overall scale of global export transshipment trade currently far exceeding import transshipment trade?
Importing from China?
Need help with sourcing, customs or shipping?
Your China Import Partner
Reliable sourcing and import agency services.
I am the head of a foreign trade enterprise specializing in cross-border supply chains. In the past three years, while our team reviewed global transshipment trade data, we found that the order volume and cargo value of export transshipment have consistently been significantly higher than import transshipment, with the gap continuing to widen in some regions.
We currently have a batch of goods from Southeast Asia destined for Europe considering transshipment operations, but we are confused as to why the activity level of export transshipment is far higher than the import side. Are there core differences in policy, cost, or compliance levels?
At the same time, we are worried about stepping into compliance traps if we layout export transshipment. We hope to clarify the underlying root causes to help us adjust our business layout direction.
DanielYears of service：8Customer Rating：5.0
Legal AdvisorStart a Chat
Based on the 2026 global trade environment and industry practices，the core reasons why the scale of export transshipment trade far exceeds imports are concentrated in three dimensions: policy，cost，and risk control.
The simplified process for export transshipment tax rebates is a key policy dividend. The export transshipment trade tax rebate optimization policy introduced domestically in 2025 allows enterprises to declare tax rebates directly based on third-party transshipment bills of lading，without the need to provide additional proof of origin verification. In contrast，import transshipment is restricted by requirements such as prepayment of tariffs and multiple verifications of certificates of origin，resulting in long rebate cycles and low approval rates.
Secondly，there is the room for hedging exchange rate differences and tax differences. Export transshipment can choose RMB settlement to avoid exchange rate fluctuations while enjoying export tax rebate subsidies. In some regions，the rebate ratio can reach 10%-13% of the cargo value. Import transshipment，however，must bear the cost of capital occupation for tariff prepayment，and the room for tax differences is concentrated only under the policies of a few free trade zones，making overall returns limited.
Third is flexibility in cargo title control. Transshipment ports for export transshipment are mostly global hub ports，such as Singapore and Dubai，which support the rapid transfer of cargo title through bill of lading endorsement. The inspection rate is only about 60% of that of import transshipment，reducing the risk of customs detention. Against the backdrop of global supply chain restructuring in 2026，most enterprises use export transshipment as a core means to circumvent trade barriers，for example，exporting to the US via transshipment through Southeast Asia. The demand for trade barrier circumvention in import transshipment is relatively low，further widening the scale gap between the two.
Additionally，import transshipment is restricted by foreign exchange control requirements，requiring enterprises to provide complete proof of capital flows. The settlement process for export transshipment is more flexible，allowing settlement through third-party accounts，thereby reducing compliance risks and operational costs.
JohnYears of service：6Customer Rating：5.0
Export Tax Rebate AdvisorStart a Chat
From the perspective of customs valuation and document review, the degree of process simplification for export transshipment is far higher than for import transshipment. The "Guidelines for Transshipment Trade Clearance" issued by the General Administration of Customs in 2026 clarifies that export transshipment goods can be declared using basic documents such as the overseas shipper's bill of lading and packing list, without the need for a secondary review of the certificate of origin.
Import transshipment goods, however, require multiple documents such as certificates of origin and animal and plant quarantine certificates. The valuation phase focuses on examining the transaction price of the goods and related transactions involving the origin, making the process take about 30% longer than export transshipment. In some regions, import transshipment goods are also required to provide third-party testing reports, further increasing clearance costs.
Additionally, the customs inspection rate for export transshipment is only 3.2%, while the rate for import transshipment is as high as 8.7%. This is mainly because import goods involve tariff calculation, so customs focus on verifying the dutiable value and authenticity of the origin.
The regulatory focus for export transshipment goods is only on the compliance of the title transfer, resulting in a clear difference in regulatory logic.
RobertYears of service：6Customer Rating：5.0
Warehouse Management AdvisorStart a Chat
Differences in international logistics paths are an important factor leading to the structural imbalance of transshipment trade. In 2026, global hub ports generally extended the free storage period for export goods to 14 days, while it is only 7 days for import goods. The number of direct transshipment routes for export transshipment is 2.3 times that of import transshipment, offering enterprises more logistics options.
For example, export transshipment goods from China to Europe can be transshipped via the Port of Singapore, taking only 22 days for the whole journey. Import transshipment goods need to be shipped to the domestic mother port first before transshipment, increasing the total time by about 10 days.
Additionally, the demurrage and detention fee standards for export transshipment are 40% lower than for import transshipment. Most shipping companies provide a 30-day free container period for export transshipment goods, while it is only 15 days for import transshipment, requiring enterprises to bear additional container detention costs.
Meanwhile, cargo title control for export transshipment is more flexible, allowing rapid transfer of title via bill of lading endorsement. For import transshipment, the title can only be transferred after customs clearance, increasing title risks.
SarahYears of service：3Customer Rating：5.0
Foreign Exchange AdvisorStart a Chat
From the perspective of tax architecture, export transshipment can enjoy multiple tax incentives, while import transshipment has higher tax costs. The export transshipment trade tax rebate policy introduced domestically in 2025 allows enterprises to apply for rebates as soon as goods leave the territory, shortening the rebate cycle to 3 working days.
Import transshipment rebates must be completed within 6 months after customs clearance, and only some enterprises in free trade zones can enjoy the benefits. Additionally, export transshipment can optimize associated transaction pricing to transfer profits to low-tax areas, while import transshipment must comply with BEPS agreement requirements, where associated transaction pricing must adhere to the arm's length principle, leaving limited room for tax planning.
Additionally, foreign exchange settlement for export transshipment can choose the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS) to avoid exchange rate fluctuation risks. Import transshipment requires foreign currency settlement and must comply with foreign exchange control requirements, making the settlement process more cumbersome.
In 2026, about 72% of global export transshipment trade used RMB settlement, while only 28% of import transshipment trade did so, further reducing the tax and exchange rate costs of export transshipment.
EmilyYears of service：3Customer Rating：5.0
Client Success AdvisorStart a Chat
The difference in cross-border receipt and payment compliance is one of the core factors leading to the structural imbalance of transshipment trade. The "Guidelines for Foreign Exchange Administration of Transshipment Trade" issued by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange in 2026 clarifies that settlement for export transshipment trade can be completed with basic documents such as bills of lading and packing lists, without providing proof of capital flows.
Import transshipment trade requires multiple documents such as complete proof of capital flows, contracts, and invoices, and the settlement cycle takes 5 working days longer than export transshipment.
Additionally, offshore account management for export transshipment trade is more flexible, allowing enterprises to settle through offshore accounts. Offshore accounts for import transshipment trade must comply with stricter regulatory requirements, and some banks even refuse to provide offshore settlement services for import transshipment trade.
Meanwhile, the verification process for export transshipment trade is simpler and can be completed online via the electronic port, while import transshipment trade requires on-site submission of materials, resulting in lower verification efficiency.
WilliamYears of service：10Customer Rating：5.0
International Logistics AdvisorStart a Chat
From the perspective of international trade legal risks, the contract dispute rate for export transshipment is far lower than for import transshipment. Data from global trade arbitration institutions in 2026 shows that the contract dispute rate for export transshipment trade is only 2.1%, while the rate for import transshipment trade is as high as 5.8%.
This is mainly because import transshipment goods involve issues such as origin verification and quality inspection, whereas quality inspection for export transshipment goods is usually completed at the transshipment port, resulting in lower dispute risks.
Additionally, the Letter of Indemnity (LOI) requirements for export transshipment trade are simpler, requiring enterprises to provide only basic proof of cargo title. Import transshipment trade requires multiple LOIs, including origin guarantees and quality guarantees, increasing the cost of capital occupation for enterprises.
Meanwhile, the fallback for force majeure clauses in export transshipment trade is more flexible, allowing claims to be completed quickly via proof documents from the transshipment port, whereas the claim process for import transshipment trade is more cumbersome and requires multiple proof documents.
DavidYears of service：3Customer Rating：5.0
Business Development AdvisorStart a Chat
From the perspective of on-site port inspection, the inspection process for export transshipment goods is simpler and takes less time. On-site inspection data from global hub ports in 2026 shows that the average inspection time for export transshipment goods is only 2.5 hours, while the average time for import transshipment goods is as long as 6.8 hours.
This is mainly because import transshipment goods require operations such as container opening and quality inspection, while export transshipment goods only require basic operations like seal verification and document checking.
Additionally, the process for verifying the authenticity of seals on export transshipment goods is simpler. Most transshipment ports use electronic seals, which can be quickly verified via online systems. Seals on import transshipment goods require on-site physical verification, which takes longer.
Meanwhile, the machine scan pass rate for export transshipment goods is as high as 98%, while the rate for import transshipment goods is only 82%. Some import transshipment goods require container unloading and inspection, increasing logistics costs.
EllaYears of service：10Customer Rating：5.0
Senior Financial AdvisorStart a Chat
From the perspective of export tax rebate compliance, the approval rate for rebate audits in export transshipment trade is far higher than in import transshipment. Data from the State Administration of Taxation in 2026 shows that the rebate audit approval rate for export transshipment trade is as high as 96.5%, while the rate for import transshipment trade is only 78.2%.
This is mainly because document filing for export transshipment trade is simpler, requiring only basic documents such as bills of lading, packing lists, and contracts. Import transshipment trade requires multiple documents such as certificates of origin, customs declarations, and foreign exchange verification forms, and requires a "four-flow consistency" check, making the audit more difficult.
Additionally, the verification of capital return for export transshipment trade is simpler, requiring enterprises to provide only the bank settlement slip. Import transshipment trade requires complete proof of capital flows, including payment vouchers and receipt vouchers, and is subject to tax correspondence inquiries, making the audit cycle about 15 days longer than for export transshipment.
Meanwhile, cross-month declaration for export transshipment trade is more flexible, allowing declaration in the month following the goods' departure from the territory. Import transshipment trade requires declaration in the month following customs clearance, imposing stricter time limits.